Simon Nash wrote:
These changes are an improvement, but they don't fully address my
concerns. It is still necessary for the xxxBindingProviderFactory
to extend from xxxBindingImpl, which itself extends from BindingImpl.
I think it would be better to avoid the need to extend from
BindingImpl, which is an implementation class in the
org.apache.tuscany.assembly.impl package and therefore presumably
not really intended for direct use by extension code.
Simon
This was just an intermediate step, I have committed more changes under
revision r536360, which now completely disconnect the providers from the
model objects.
However, even before there was no requirement to subclass BindingImpl,
the requirement was to implement the Binding interface :)
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
