+1 to starting with the package renames on Friday. ...ant
On 5/10/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for controlled commits. If people will ensure no commits on Thursday after about 24.00Hrs Pacific Time (US and Canada), I can go ahead and change the core-spi packages to include 'sca'. Ant, please let me know if there are other things that I can help with. I am also going to start looking at getting the spec-api itest to work. Thanks - Venkat On 5/9/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Raymond Feng wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried a bit to rename some of the packages (not adding sca yet) but > > > I just realized that it became a bit out of control with the flood of > > > check-ins. > > > > > > Maybe the best way is that we agree on the naming convention for the > > > core-spi and core and then have one person to do all the refactoring > > > in one shot once we see a functionally stable code base. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Raymond > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Venkata Krishnan" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:48 PM > > > Subject: Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release > > > > > > > > >> Hi.. .what about the workitem related to renaming the core-spi to > > >> include > > >> 'sca' for packages. Is it a good time to do this ? Thanks > > >> > > >> - Venkat > > >> > > >> On 5/4/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > ant elder wrote: > > >>> > > There's been a lot of progress, things are starting to look good > > >>> and > > >>> > most > > >>> > > things on the wiki page ( > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents > > >>> > > >>> > ) > > >>> > > > > >>> > > look like they're nearing completion. So I think what we should > > >>> do is > > >>> > > aim at > > >>> > > creating an SVN branch for the release around Tuesday next week, > > >>> > > start > > >>> > > being > > >>> > > more controlled about what changes go into the branch and start > > >>> > > publishing > > >>> > > candidate distributions from that, then when we think it looks > > >>> ok > > vote > > >>> > on > > >>> > > the final release candidate from that, hopefully by the end of > > next > > >>> > week. > > >>> > > Does this sound ok to everyone? It does mean most changes anyone > > >>> > > wants > > >>> > in > > >>> > > should be tried to be committed by Tuesday. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > The latest distribution downloads to try out are available at: > > >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/ > > >>> > > > > >>> > > There's now a Java-SCA-0.90 version in Jira so any bugs found or > > >>> things > > >>> > > people want to get done should be added there: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 > > >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > ...ant > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > +1 from me. Like you said a lot of what we had on the Wiki are > near > > >>> > completion. One of the most important items I think is to complete > > >>> the > > >>> > clean up of the code base and simplify further some of our > > interfaces > > >>> > for extensions, but Tuesday looks reasonable to me. > > >>> > > > >>> > -- > > >>> > Jean-Sebastien > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > > >>> > Sounds like a good timescale to me. Gives time to finish the > sample > > >>> builds > > >>> and readmes. > > >>> > > >>> Simon > > >>> > > >> > > > > There has been many commits and good progress the last few days, so I > > spent a little bit of time checking the status of the trunk. > > > > Here's a summary of what I found: > > - The code cleanup is almost complete, I think there's a little bit work > > left to refactor one last .spi. package, remove a few dead classes, also > > it looks like Raymond has started to clean up the Scope registry and > > WorkContext I'm not sure if it's finished or not. > > - The Java, Script and RMI extensions are now stable, as well as the > > sample implementation, binding, and data binding extensions. > > - It looks like we have a reasonable Web app story with a servlet > > context listener, but it may require a little bit of cleanup to avoid > > confusion with sca-contribution.xml. I'm also not sure if it allows to > > expose Web Services from a Web app, or if we even want to do that now. > > > > Main todo's that I could think of: > > - Port the Web Service binding extension to the latest code, as it's > > really important to have, and is also used by many integration tests. > > - Run RAT and check licenses and notices. > > - Check why the itest/spec-api test cases are failing. > > - Create a JAR containing the source of our runtime, to help debugging > > in an IDE. > > - Are the samples build.xml finished? > > - I have ported the Spring extension to the latest code but need to do a > > little bit of cleanup tomorrow before committing it. > > - I'm not sure about the JSONRPC binding, wouldn't it be nice to have it > > too? > > - Lazy loading of our modules to avoid loading too many dependencies > > when using tuscany-sca-all.jar. > > - Rename the packages to *.sca.* but I would suggest to delay this to a > > later point some time next week after our first RC. > > > > And there's probably a few more :) > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > We've made tons of progress on all these things so the release is looking > really close to being ready and the time approaching to either cut a > branch > or switch to a more controlled commit mode on the trunk. Hopefully we > could > do this tomorrow, so this is just a fyi to start getting all your last > minute changes in... > > ...ant >
