On 5/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip] ant elder wrote: > Here's todays weekly IRC chat log. The only topic discussed was the > SCA 0.90release, the current plan is to cut a > 0.90 release branch this Wednesday. > > We went through the open JIRA's targeted at 0.90 to see if anyone wanted > particular JIRA's as must fix for 0.90 and which ones could be > defered. The > current JIRA's for 0.90 are: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 > > . Tomorrow I'm going to move all of those out of 0.90 except for > TUSCANY-1247, TUSCANY-1248, and TUSCANY-1265. If anyone has any others > which should be in 0.90 just say. > > The samples were also discussed, sounds like most of them are ready, > there's > some issues around the those related to how to write Tuscany extensions, > discussion will continue on the mailing list. > > Venkat will run RAT against the current distro's and email the mailing > list > the results, slaws will try the distro's on linux. > > The latest distributions built of the trunk code as of just now (r537917) > are at: > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/< http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/latest/>. > > Please try these out and report any issues (or even just that you > tried and > a sample worked!) > > ...ant > Sorry that I missed yesterday's IRC chat. I have a few more things to add to our TODO list for the release: I'd like to have in the binary distro a JAR containing the Tuscany source that people can attach to the Tuscany JAR for debugging in an IDE (we already discussed this on the list but can't find the thread now).
Could just the src distribution be used for this for 0.90? I've just tried and Eclipse works fine using that as the src for the Tuscany all jar.
I am not sure where we are with our Webapp story. If we go with the context listener approach, we need to adjust it to take its configuration and list of deployables from sca-contribution.xml instead of web.xml. If we go with another approach we need to adjust the sample. For consistency, SCADomain.newInstance() should also work without a list of composites and take its configuration from sca-contribution.xml if there is one. We need some samples to show sca-contribution.xml (adjust some of the existing samples). The above items are important IMO as they touch APIs used by application developers.
I've taken all the config based on init-params out of the webapp host so currently it just uses whatever composites it finds in the top-level classes folder of the webapp. The calculator-web sample works with this and doesn't specify any special config. is this not enough for 0.90? If not then is there anyone who volunteers to add the sca-contribution.xml (and when can they get it done?) ? ...ant
