Ok, i re-read this last email again [1] and i guess i missed the "...if we could make it work consistently, with JARs as well as WARs" bit before. I'm not sure I agree with that, why should WARs be hamstrung with a less user friendly way of working just because jars can't work as easily? If we can have this really simple approach working in WARs why not support it, its not like jars and wars are interchangeable?
...ant [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200705.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 5/16/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That wasn't my understanding, If we go this way, won't this cause different behaviours depending on the host environment (web versus J2SE for example). Is this desirable ? On 5/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That says - "In order to use this approach, you will need to specify a > sca-contribution.xml inside the META-INF directory of your web-app" - > wasn't > the sca-contribution.xml file going to be optional, and if you didn't have > it then all the .composite files found it the top-level folder in the > webapp > would be deployed? > > ...ant > > On 5/16/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have updated the wiki link with our current story for web applications > > based on recent discussions and the usage of sca-contribution.xml > > > > [1] > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Tuscany+SCA+Web+Application+Integration+Story > > > > On 5/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > [snip] > > > ant elder wrote: > > > > > > > > Another approach would be to have a Tuscany specific customized > Tomact > > > > configuration so that defining the Tuscany specific web.xml things > > isn't > > > > required and they get defined automatically during the webapp > startup, > > > > perhaps by noticing there's a META-INF/sca-contribution.xml file in > > the > > > > webapp. This isn't to hard to do and is similar to the Tomcat 'deep > > > > integration' we had in the M1 release. This seems quite a nice > > > > approach to > > > > me but it does mean that Tuscany SCA webapps wont work in other > webapp > > > > runtimes without being modified to add in the web.xml config. > > > > > > > > For this release I think I favour either option 0 or option 3 maybe > > > > modified > > > > to support sca-contribution.xml instead of <context-param>. > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > > > +1, option 3 looks good to me, if we modify it to support > > > sca-contribution.xml instead of <context-param>. > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
