Luciano Resende wrote:
I pretty much have it working locally, building SCA, SDO and DAS
independently.
As for hosting the build at the shared machine at Apache, I have
created a JIRA [1] asking for an account to add and administer the
builds on the shared machine.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1261
On 5/26/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for doing this :). +1 for separating out SCA, SDO and DAS builds
- Venkat
On 5/23/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm starting to pursue a nightly build for Apache Tuscany with the
> Apache Infra guys, and I just want to double check what people think
> it's the best build layout that we should use
>
> - Have one top-down build, that would build all Tuscany subprojects
> (SCA/SDO/DAS)
>
> - Have three builds, that would build each project separately
>
> I particularly would prefer the second option, as that would ensure
> each subproject can work independently, based on published
> releases/snapshots of it's dependencies.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Nice. Quick question, as it looks like you're going to have 3 different
builds for SCA, SDO and DAS:
If I download the SCA and SDO builds for example, will the SCA build use
the exact same level of SDO that I'll get with the SDO build? In other
words are we making sure that they work together?
Thanks
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
