Hi, I can vouch for how useful the current host implementations have been during the development and testing cycle. So +1 for a host-jms.
- Venkat On 5/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, To me, an embedded broker will help development testing. We can use the same strategy: if the broker module is present, its module activator can start a broker in the "start()" method. For external brokers, just don't add the broker module to the classpath. Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 6:50 AM Subject: Re: JMS on new SPIs > Do you think people would want to run message queue brokers as part of the > Tuscany runtime? Brokers would tend to be run and managed elsewhere with > turcny connecting to them. We could do it as a convenience and a cool > feature of course but be interested to understand how realistic the > scenario > is. > > Simon > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
