Could you explain a little more about what you are trying to do?

Regards,

Geoff.

On 01/06/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is there any other way to use static object on sdo c++?

Adriano Crestani

On 5/31/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for clarification ; )
>
> Adriano Crestani
>
> On 5/31/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > Adriano, this isn't so much a bug as unsupported function.
> >
> > DataFactory::generateInterface() is not part of the spec (I believe)
and
> > was
> > an old experiment in supporting static SDOs. As far as I am aware the
> > code
> > has never been tested. I'm pretty sure I'd removed it before but it
> > looks
> > like it's still in there!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > On 31/05/07, Adriano Crestani < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I used the DataFactory::generateInterface() and I got the following
> > code:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > DataObjectList& Config::getRelationship //missing parameters
> > definition
> > > {
> > >    return the_object->getList("Relationship");
> > > }
> > > ...
> > >
> > > It is not generating the parameters definition of any function that
> > > returns
> > > a DataObjectList&. Bellow is the code I use to generate the code
> > above:
> > >
> > >
> > > commonj::sdo::DataFactoryPtr dataFactory =
> > > commonj::sdo::DataFactory::getDataFactory();
> > > commonj::sdo::XSDHelperPtr xsdh =
> > > commonj::sdo::HelperProvider::getXSDHelper(dataFactory);
> > > xsdh->defineFile("config.xsd");
> > > dataFactory->generateInterface("DataFactoryImpl",
"DataFactoryImpl");
> > >
> > > And here is the config.xsd:
> > >
> > > <xsd:schema
> > >   xmlns:config="apache.das.rdb"
> > >   xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> > >   targetNamespace="apache.das.rdb.config"
> > >   elementFormDefault="qualified">
> > >
> > >   <xsd:element name="Config" type="Config"/>
> > >
> > >   <xsd:complexType name="Config">
> > >      <xsd:all>
> > >        <xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="Table"
> > > type="Table"/>
> > >        <xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"
> > > name="Relationship"
> > > type="Relationship"/>
> > >      </xsd:all>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="uri" type="xsd:string"/>
> > >   </xsd:complexType>
> > >
> > >   <xsd:complexType name="Relationship">
> > >      <xsd:all>
> > >         <xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="1"
> > name="KeyPair"
> > > type="KeyPair"/>
> > >      </xsd:all>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="name" type="xsd:string"/>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="primaryKeyTable" type="xsd:string"
> > > use="required"/>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="foreignKeyTable" type="xsd:string"
> > > use="required"/>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="many" type="xsd:boolean" default="true"/>
> > >   </xsd:complexType>
> > >
> > >   <xsd:complexType name="Table">
> > >      <xsd:all>
> > >         <xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"
name="Column"
> >
> > > type="Column"/>
> > >      </xsd:all>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="tableName" type="xsd:string"
> > use="required"/>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="typeName" type="xsd:string"/>
> > >   </xsd:complexType>
> > >
> > >   <xsd:complexType name="KeyPair">
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="primaryKeyColumn" type="xsd:string"
> > > use="required"/>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="foreignKeyColumn" type="xsd:string"
> > > use="required"/>
> > >   </xsd:complexType>
> > >
> > >   <xsd:complexType name="Column">
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="columnName" type="xsd:string"
> > use="required"/>
> > >    <xsd:attribute name="sqlType" type="xsd:string" use="required"/>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="propertyName" type="xsd:string"/>
> > >      <xsd:attribute name="primaryKey" type="xsd:boolean"
> > default="false"/>
> > >   </xsd:complexType>
> > >
> > > </xsd:schema>
> > >
> > > Am I committing some mistake or it's really a bug?
> > >
> > > Adriano Crestani
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pete
> >
>
>

Reply via email to