Point taken about the wordiness. I'm OK with this version.
Simon
ant elder wrote:
Actually, as we're finding so much to do on the website and as June 2 is a
Saturday how about we leave it till Monday June 4?
Still not sure how to describe it, see below...
...ant
On 6/1/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
Apache Tuscany Java SCA provides a runtime based on the OASIS Open
> Composite
> Services Architecture SCA specifications which aim to simplify SOA
> Application Development.
>
We shouldn't describe it in this way as this makes it sound like these
are OASIS specs, which they aren't yet but will be (hopefully) in the
future. I'd suggest "... a runtime based on the Service Component
Architecture specifications from the Open SOA collaboration (osoa.org),
aimed at simplifying SOA Application Development. These specifications
have been submitted to OASIS for standardization as part of Open
Composite
Services Architecture (Open CSA)."
Is that starting to sound a little wordy for the 2nd line of an
announcement
with more info about specifications groups than Tuscany itself? I don't
know
the relationship btw the groups, do we need to mention Open SOA
collaboration? Could it be something like:
"Apache Tuscany provides a runtime based on the Service Component
Architecture. SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
Application Development which are now being standardized at OASIS as
part of
Open Composite Services Architecture (Open CSA)."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
