On 6/4/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sebastien, You may like to wait just a little - I have done a series of updates to the code which have got it very near to running basic examples. I'll undertake to fix it to the latest level in trunk as well (I have become VERY wary of moving up trunk levels after wasting immense amounts of time earlier due to the level of churn in trunk....).
You shouldn't need to worry about this anymore as from 0.90 on things should be far more stable and backward compatible. If anyone does happen to notice a breaking change occur in trunk please do say so we know that it was a considered and intentional thing to be doing. ...ant
