On 6/11/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good suggestion Steffen. If you were able to open a Jira and dump into it any thoughts you may have had about the details of how you see this working that would be great. The more detail you put there, the more likely it is that someone who wants to get their hands dirty would be likely to pick it up; unless of course you have plans for doing it yourself. As an aside, it's always interesting to know the background to why a particular feature is important to someone, so if you felt like commenting on your scenarios that would benefit from this too, whether in the JIRA on or the list, that would be great. For my part here are the things that I'd like to see done ... - reorganisation of the build to create release distributions in line with the SCA release format
One thing we should do for this right now is move spec/sdo-api from the Tuscany SVN trunk top-level folder into the sdo folder, so sdo/sdo-api. Another thing i'd wondered about was making an sdo jar that contained all the emf dependencies to simplify things for users. So that would be something like all the codegen, ecore, xsd and tuscany-sdo-* jars merged into a single sdo-complete.jar. While building that it could also rename the emf packages to start with org.apache.tuscany to avoid any version problems when using Tuscany SDO with existing EMF code. Does anyone else think this would be useful? ...ant
