On 6/12/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've starting to move and reorganize some of the distributed runtime ideas from my sandbox into the trunk. So far there is not much there modules/ topology - and empty module for topology model things samples/ calculator-distributed - the current motivating use case. There have been several threads around this recently covering topology, base uris and distribution, for example. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18613.html and http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18644.html I've be updating the page ( http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Distributed+Runtime) to try and capture some of the thinking. Over the next few days I'm going to try and get the basic SCADomain topology meta data reading up and running in head. I welcome any comments or help in this area. Regards Simon
Hi Jean-Sebastien Following the last few comments from the Lazy loading thread [1] I see you added some model classes to the topology model. I'm now filling out the o.a.t.s.topology.xml package a little. A bit of an education for me on how the xml reading works! What I plan to do is get a very simple model read in, representing the node and the topology component of that node, and populate this with the list of components that are assigned to the node. Once we have the list of component to node assignements read in I can then worry about how this slots into the rest of the runtime. It's probably going to have to be a bit subtler that my previous changes to the CompositeActivator I suspect. I'm going to need a little help with this bit. So more questions later Simon [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg18798.html
