Thanks Amita for looking into this...
I have fixed the distribution issue as in TUSCANY-1348, and the
logging issue as in TUSCANY-1349. I also noticed an issue with logging
in dbConfig, where we were not checking if logging was enabled and
always calling log, and I have also fixed that.

Please let me know if things are looking better now.

On 6/14/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Small update, tried to build and test with empty repos and it went through
with no issues.

Regards,
Amita

On 6/13/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Things tested to be working -
> all UT as part of mvn build
> all samples in different browsers.
>
> Apart from das\distribution\binary\pom.xml - change and documentation
> changes in JIRA 1335, I have a doubt in logging mechanism in web samples.
>
> In DBConfig utility , the code uses Logger.getLogger(className) - to get
> logger from log4j.
>
> Whereas in all RDB DAS code, it is
> LoggerFactory.INSTANCE.getLogger(className) - to get logger from RDB DAS
> util.
> In this, the level is OFF - hardcoded in the code.
>
> So, when the log4j.properties file is used in tomcat to switch on logging,
> the logging works for DBConfig (as it is using direct log4j), but logging
> does not switch on for RDB DAS classes, as it is hardcoded OFF in the RDB
> DAS jar.
>
> Is this the desired behavior? Will there be any need to switch on logging
> in web samples for RDB DAS code and how to do it without touching
> tuscany-das-rdb-1.0-incubating.jar?
>
> Regards,
> Amita
>
> On 6/11/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > When tried mvn -Pdistribution on das:-
> > das\distribution\binary\pom.xml - does not list ajax web sample under
> > dependency and thus does not package same
> >
> > As now, non-committer does not have access to edit wiki, I have created
> > JIRA-TUSCANY-1335 for all the pending updates for DAS I was doing. Please
> > see how these can be completed using attached zipped files.
> >
> > Architecture Guide - 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+architecture+guide
> >
> > images to upload - ClassDiag.jpg, rdbDAS.gif
> >
> > User Guide -
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+-+User+Guide
> > Under Samples(See Capabilities in use)
> > Put links for:-
> > Web Sample -
> > 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/samples/companyweb/readme.htm
> > J2SE Sample -
> > 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/samples/customer/readme.htm
> > Advanced Web Sample - 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/samples/sample-ajax-das/readme.htm
> >
> >
> > Development Guide - DAS_Java_Development_Guide.txt - need to add to wiki
> >
> > need to checkin under 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/distribution/src/main/release/RELEASE
> > NOTES
> > RELEASE_NOTES.txt
> >
> > About to complete CHANGES.txt , will add by eod to JIRA 1335..
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amita
> >
> > On 6/10/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > I went through all das samples and they seem to be working fine on
> > > Windows
> > > XP Home Edition SP 2 environment. I also corrected some links on
> > > readmes
> > > that were pointing to old tuscany website.
> > >
> > > I ran the rat on java/das directory and added Apache Licence header to
> > > files
> > > that were missing it.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Adriano Crestani
> > >
> > > On 6/8/07, Luciano Resende < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > First of all, let me thank you all for helping on this release.
> > > > Recently there has been a lot of progress, and things are looking
> > > good
> > > > from the list of issues we had listed in the wiki [1]. The remaining
> > > > documentation tasks could probably go in parallel with the release
> > > > candidates. So, we should start thinking about creating a branch for
> > > > the next release sometime soon, probably over the weekend or Monday
> > > > and then start publishing release candidates from that.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I think we should look into the following items before we
> > > create
> > > > the first RC :
> > > >
> > > >    - run rat and make the results available
> > > >    - review the contents of license, readme, release_notes, changes,
> > > etc
> > > >    - review javadoc
> > > >    - make sure samples readme are updated and correct and the
> > > samples
> > > > are working ok on different environments
> > > >
> > > > I'd also like to suggest two other things :
> > > >    - Name the release beta1, to be aligned with the beta1 release of
> > > SDO.
> > > >    - Any blocking issue to be tracked as blocking JIRA and directly
> > > > assigned to beta1 release.
> > > >
> > > > Does this sound ok to everyone?  Any Thoughts ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+-+Java+DAS+Beta1+Release
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>



--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to