Sorry, I'm having some restricted internet access as I'm traveling
since last week... that's probably why we haven't created a DAS
release candidate yet... but the community and I think that we are
ready to have one.
Yes, the idea is to have a DAS beta1 dependency on SCA 0.91 on the
following items:
- implementation.das
- implementation.data
- some samples (maybe including the samples we didn't ship in 0.9)
On 6/18/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What will be the relationship between SCA 0.91 and DAS? I have seen
> some discussions on the list about a DAS release. Will SCA 0.91 have
> this DAS release as a dependency?
>
> Simon
>
> Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> > I have updated the wiki [1] page with things that I'm working on, and
> > would like to have in 0.91 .
> >
> > As for the implementation.das question regarding it's canned derby
db,
> > we recently created a db utility to create and populate the database,
> > and I have plans to integrate with it.
> >
> > [1]
> >
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents
> >
> >
> > On 6/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Wow 571 license problems! after being clean for 0.90 just a month
ago.
> >>
> >> One question this brings up is what is actually intended to be
> >> included in
> >> 0.91? There's been quite a few new extensions and demo's etc added
> >> recently
> >> but no one has said they want those included in 0.91. Should they be
by
> >> default or should we just include things that are mentioned on the
> >> release
> >> wiki page? If so anyone else care to help clean things up, add
missing
> >> license headers, check the distribution works and includes
> >> dependencies etc?
> >> The implementation.das is including an entire database in the
src, is
> >> there
> >> any way that could be generated by the tests?
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> >> On 6/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks Ant. So could we all please use this wiki page to put down
> >> things
> >> > that are going to be increments over 0.90.
> >> >
> >> > Also I run the RAT on the trunk - just java/sca and here is the
> >> report. I
> >> > intend to go and fix the missing headers just ahead of cutting the
> >> branch.
> >> > Before that if anybody would like to jump in and help with this,
> >> please feel
> >> > free do so.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt<
http://people.apache.org/%7Esvkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > - Venkat
> >> >
> >> > On 6/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Taking a branch around the 20th sounds ok to me.
> >> > >
> >> > > The high level things I'm focusing on for the 0.91 release are:
> >> > >
> >> > > - Simplification of using script components (working without
> >> > > .componentType
> >> > > side files)
> >> > > - First cut of the simpler binding/implementation SPI
> >> > > - clean up of ajax and jsonrpc bindings
> >> > > - The EJB binding
> >> > >
> >> > > I'd also said to someone on the user list I'd get WS services
without
> >> > > wsdl
> >> > > working so will try to do that as well.
> >> > >
> >> > > Most of the code for those is close-ish to being done, though
there's
> >> > > still
> >> > > a whole lot of related sample work to get done.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'd started a wiki page for 0.91 at
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents
> >>
> >> > >
> >> > > ...ant
> >> > >
> >> > > On 6/13/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks for the faith and encouragement. This is going to
be my
> >> first
> >> > > > experience and I am sure of getting all the help from you
folks
to
> >> > > pull
> >> > > > this
> >> > > > off successfully.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > So, to start with, I propose to cut a branch around June 20th,
> >> > > 2007. If
> >> > > > people are ok with this, then all that we'd like to be a part
of
> >> > > 0.91should
> >> > > > get in by then (June 20th, 2007). Does that work fine with
> >> everybody?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Also, I'd also like to list down the significant additions /
> >> > > enhancements
> >> > > > over 0.90 for the Release Notes. You can state the item here
on
> >> this
> >> > > > thread
> >> > > > and I will take care of recording it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Venkat
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 6/13/07, Simon Nash < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > +1 from me too. I'm sure Venkat will do a fine job.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Simon
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Simon Laws wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> Yeah, Venkat did loads on the last release. +1 from me
for
> >> Venkat
> >> > > as
> >> > > > > >> 0.91 RM
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> Simon
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > +1 from me
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
