The options are moved to lib as well (see org.apache.tuscany.sdo.api.SDOHelper.XMLOptions). Implementation of the options needs to be in the impl project since they have EMF dependencies.
Frank. "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/21/2007 05:23:56 AM: > <snip/> > > > 2)Why ResolvableImpl is in tuscany-sdo-lib, should it not be in > > tuscany-sdo-impl? As this class is > > in tuscany-sdo-lib and not tuscany-sdo-impl, it can not make use of options > > implementation in tuscany-sdo-impl, > > as these impl classes are not visible in tuscany-sdo-lib. > > > <snip/> > Frank Budinsky has the reorganisation of code from just the impl > project to an impl/lib split as work in progress [1]. So I guess we > need to understand the reason for having ResolvableImpl in the lib > project. Without deep investigation my guess is that Frank has good > reasons for making the move, so I can see a couple of alternatives, > but I need to gain more insight to know which would be best > > 1) investigate whether the correct home for the options is in the lib project > 2) provide some kind of a mapping of options between the impl layer > and the lib layer > > I think it would be good if you could put down your design ideas or > provide a prototype patch so that I can see the problem for the wider > perspective. > > Regards, Kelvin. > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1283 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
