Hi Pete, I submitted these JIRA issues:
TUSCANY-1366 C++ SDO spec portability: SDORuntimeException off-spec member functions TUSCANY-1367 C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: Type::Types::IntegerType should be renamed Type::Types::IntType TUSCANY-1368 C++ SDO portability: class interface Type off-spec enum values Michael -----Original Message----- From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SDO spec compliance/portability: Type enums the num_type is just a convenient way to know the extent of an enum and is common practice. I guess the OpenDataObjectType must be a Tuscany specific extension to handle open types. I'd need to do some research to determine if this is missing from the spec or can be removed. Please raise a Jira for the renaming of IntegerType. It may be useful to raise Jiras for all these issues so we can track them. Cheers, On 21/06/07, Michael Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The Tuscany SDO C++ class Type::Types enum has these values which do > not appear in the C++ 2.1 specification: > > - OpenDataObjectType > - num_type > > Would it be appropriate to file a bug to remove the additional values? > Or alternatively a bug for them to be > submitted to the spec committee? > > In addition the 2.1 spec renamed the enum value "IntegerType" to > "IntType". > > Would it be appropriate to file a bug to have this value renamed? > > Thanks, > > Michael Yoder > Software Developer > Rogue Wave Software > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Pete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
