Jacek,
It's fine to post stuff about the SCA and SDO specifications here on the
Tuscany mailing list. There is also a feedback page on www,osoa.org
(the site for the specifications themselves) here:
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Feedback+on+SCA+Specifications
Regarding your comment here - yes, this is a bug in the spec. I will
add it to the Errata list for the Assembly spec here:
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Errata+for+Assembly+Model+V1.00
The SCA XSDs (lines 3107 onwards) are correct - they show that zero or
more bindings are allowed. The spec text and the associated XSD snippet
are incorrect.
Yours, Mike.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
(I hope it's allowed to post emails about sca spec here and it won't
be considered as spam)
While reading the SCA spec I came across the following sentences - page 13:
180 A service element has one or more binding elements as children. If
no bindings are specified,
181 then the bindings specified for the service by the implementation
are in effect.
Is that a mistake where it's written that a service element has one or
more binding elements as opposed to the following sentence that starts
with "If no bindings..."? Where should I report it?
Jacek
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
