On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/2/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am looking at the Policy Framework and shall update the wiki on the > specifics soon. Once this is done to some level, I'd also like to help a > bit with the ws-* things (may be WS-Security to start with) that Ant has > listed on the wiki page. > > - Venkat > > On 6/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > With the SCA 0.91 release now being voted on how about starting on 0.92? > > > > I've already been adding some things I'm interested in getting done to > the > > next release wiki page - > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents- > > so far thats mainly related to improving web services functionality. > > > > So anyone else interested in helping with an 0.92 release or have any > > function they'd like to suggest or add to the wiki page? How does aiming > > for > > getting it done 4 - 6 weeks again sound? > > > > ...ant > > The above link has an extrenuous "-" on the end. Taking that off gets me to the page. Can we move this information across the to the new wiki space ( http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home) so that everyone (including non committers) can add to it? I'm working on the next phase of the distributed runtime which I want to get into the next release. This involves a few items. SCA Binding Topology model Distributed domain Node implementation Management assembly Also I need some of the ws items, in particular the ability to run without wsdl, so can help out there. We need to do something about logging and events to improvide runtime usability. We've talked about it before but not done anything yet. Ties into the management assembly. I'd also like to see the JMS binding in the release but can't commit to doing lots more work on including spec features. It's been working fine for me in my limited synchronous/rpc model. If I get time I'll take a look to see what it will take to add minimum asynch support but if anyone else fancies having a go at this then it's a good way to learn about Tuscany extensions.
All these sound good, but its starting to sound a lot to get done in just a few weeks. How does the suggesting timeframe of 4 or so weeks sound? We'd talked once about having a release specifically targeting things like logging, events, and error handling. I'd still like to do that, if anyone wants to start now thats great but I doubt I'd have much time to help this release. ...ant
