Thanks, Kelvin. I thought I was seeing different behaviour last week
when I was testing this but I must have had a bug in my test. I've
added a test to the CTS based on your code snippet.
Thanks,
Andy.
On 7/2/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andy,
for the following code snippet ....
List pFoo = person1.getList("foo");
List bar = *new* ArrayList();
person1.set("foo", bar);
pFoo = person1.getList("foo");
person1.unset("foo");
pFoo = person1.getList("foo");
I see pFoo ending up as null
Regards, Kelvin.
On 02/07/07, Andy Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a question about the correct behaviour of getList().
>
> If I have an open DataObject and I call getList( "foo" ) where foo is
> not a defined property or an instance property, I would expect
> getList() to return NULL. This is currently the case in Tuscany.
>
> If "foo" is set and later unset, I would still expect getList( "foo" )
> to return NULL. However, in this case, Tuscany returns an empty list.
>
> This appears to be a bug in Tuscany but before I raise a JIRA and
> write a CTS test I wanted to ask if this is the intended behaviour and
> if I am interpreting the specification correctly here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy Grove
> Product Architect, HydraSDO
> Rogue Wave Software
> http://www.roguewave.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Thanks,
Andy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
