Folks,
OK, finally, I bite ;-)
The question for me is whether we need the SCA (Java) spec to define
some standard metadata (typically annotations) for databindings of
services & references.
I make the assumption that for much of the time, it is possible to work
out the required databinding simply by inspection of the types of the
parameters involved. If you find an SDO object, if you find a JAXB
object, etc.
So is the real issue the case where mixed types of data objects turn up?
Or are there ambiguous cases where you can't tell what the kind of
object is?
I suppose that we can take two views of cases like these:
a) Don't go there, it's not valid.
b) OK, annotate your code enough to tell us exactly what you expect to
happen.
If we want to go down the second path, then I'm happy to carry back
requirements to the SCA Java WG, but I'd really like an appreciation of
just how common this case is likely to be.
Views please....
Yours, Mike.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
