Hi Kelvin, I am working with Amita on T-1317 and T-1391 for SDO R1.0. I think both are very close and should be done by the end of next week (7/13).
I am also working on T-1408. According to comments from Frank B., I am planning to change creating a SDO property programmatically by creating an XSD element instead of attribute. I will update the patch file when I am ready next week. T-1385 is complete for XMLHelper except save function for XMLStreamHelper. I will try looking into it next week too. Fuhwei kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was aiming at a release candidate by early to mid of next week. It's a bit later than planned. I've been hit by a hardware failure, and have been head down on fixing up the samples. I've just been doing a catch-up collation of the info relating to release contents. I feel sure that there will be at least one candidate respin required, given the significant changes in build structure, so if I get there before you David, as TUSCANY-1143 is an important fix, we can absorb this fix into a second candidate. We'll have to double fix it, as I will cut a branch/tag at the time I make the first candidate. I have reviewed 3 sources of material -- JIRAs already labelled for the next release; JIRA activity since my last summary on June 11th and other issues mentioned in this thread, not already covered. Comments please ..... Unresolved JIRAs with a 1.0 fix version ============================ here's the jet of JIRAs..... TUSCANY-1408 Cannot programmatically define a SDO property matching to XSD element TUSCANY-1317 Provide a way to set default XML load options to be used during Java deserialization TUSCANY-1385 Duplicate namespace was serialized when SDO QName property value containing existing namespace TUSCANY-1358 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot generate XSD since SDO Type 'item' was orginally generated from XSD. Use original XSD TUSCANY-1350 Reorganise SDO build / distribution layout TUSCANY-257 recently added file Interface2JavaGenerator.java is not compatible with JDK 1.4 TUSCANY-1122 TypeConversionTestCase fails for JDK 1.4.2 TUSCANY-1143 Generated code should separate metadata creation from registration to permit proper scoping and here's my comments on them .... 1408 Patch avalable - hope to get to it v soon 1317 Amita/Fuhwei -- lots of activity - What's the outlook? 1385 Patch available, but comment suggests not quite ready -- is it ready to apply? 1350 significantly progressed, may require more changes as part of release management 257,1122 -- Java 1.4.2 tolerance -- I hope to get to these 1143, See response in this thread earlier today from David Adcox Updated jiras since 11/6/2007 (excluding jiras covered above) =============================================== TUSCANY-1293 SDO does not work with OSGi Bryan Hunt "For the short term, you might consider removing the ability to build Eclipse plug-ins (OSGi bundles) from your pom. " Not in plan for 1.0 TUSCANY-1359 New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on properties where 'isMany' is true I'll apply it if a patch file with the fix and a test appear in time TUSCANY-1391 Provide capability to load and save XML with unknown features I haven't found time to review the available patch and I can't see me getting to it, so not currently in my plan TUSCANY-1128 Support attribute and element with same name It's not clear whether we are good to go here, it's not currently in my 1.0 plan to integrate it TUSCANY-477 SDO runtime should report unresolved types in a meaningful way if xsd:import/include cannot be resolved Not in my plan Other things pulled from this thread not covered above ======================================= TUSCANY-303 Single package override in tuscany-sca-plugin and tuscany-sdo-plugin insufficient I'll include a fix if it comes along soon -- from my point of view, nice to have but not essential Steffen's - typesafe collections in the xsd2java generator No JIRA raised -- could be new feature in a future release general things I talked about for the release (build structure, samples, website, generator testing) - build structure is mostly done - samples are significantly changed, i have more to do but will round off soon - website can be done while release candidates are being reviewed - generator testing is a nice to have that I don't think I'll get the time to address TUSCANY-1127 and 1288 are resolved Making a merged sdo-all jar. I think the issues raised by Fuhwei, in particular the requirement to merge the contents of similarly named files in the EMF artifacts make this a non-starter for this release. Regards, Kelvin. On 05/07/07, David Adcox wrote: > Kelvin, > > I'm going to take a run at Tuscany-1143. I've started looking into > this issue and hope to have something by middle to end of next week. > Let me know if this will work for your timetable. > > Thanks, > David > > On 6/26/07, kelvin goodson wrote: > > I'd like to take a quick roll call if possible please. > > > > Who if anyone is working on these issues? When do you think they will be > > ready by? Is anyone working on an issue not referenced in the attached note > > that they want in the 1.0 but haven't said so? > > > > I've been working on the build structure and the samples. In order to have > > any chance of being close to getting a release candidate through voting by > > mid of next month were going to need your contributions in very soon, > > knowing how it usually takes a few of release candidate iterations in > > general before a successful PMC vote. Ideally, your contributions > > permitting, I'd like to be in a position to build a release candidate in the > > middle part of next week. > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > > > On 11/06/07, kelvin goodson wrote: > > > > > > Good suggestion Steffen. If you were able to open a Jira and dump into it > > > any thoughts you may have had about the details of how you see this > > > working that would be great. The more detail you put there, the more > > > likely it is that someone who wants to get their hands dirty would be > > > likely > > > to pick it up; unless of course you have plans for doing it yourself. As > > > an aside, it's always interesting to know the background to why a > > > particular feature is important to someone, so if you felt like commenting > > > on your scenarios that would benefit from this too, whether in the JIRA > > > on or the list, that would be great. > > > > > > For my part here are the things that I'd like to see done ... > > > - reorganisation of the build to create release distributions in line with > > > the SCA release format > > > - review and improvement of the samples and implementation of an > > > alternative simple approach to running the samples that does not involve > > > running a maven build > > > - review and improvement of the website documentation > > > > > > In addition, some things I'd like to see being done, but I don't see as > > > absolute prerequisites for a release are ... > > > - creation of a further sdo sub-project that permits automated exercising > > > of the sdo plugin and java generator > > > - more test cases > > > > > > In terms of JIRA's, we currently have 3 marked for the specific > > > release[1], rather then > > > the generic Java-SDO-Next bucket [2] that is the placeholder for Jiras not > > > assigned to a release. > > > TUSCANY-1317 , > > > TUSCANY-1143 , > > > TUSCANY-513 > > > > > > The first is there because the originator marked it for the beta1, which > > > it didn't make, but it looks well defined, so after the beta1 I changed > > > the fix release to the 1.0 release, but I don't think I'll have > > > thebandwidth to cover this. > > > The second is there because I want it to be, and plan to tackle it. > > > The third is there because the originator has provided a patch and I'm in > > > the process of committing it. > > > > > > In the light of my priorities above, having taken a scan through [2] in > > > addition to 1143, I plan to look at ... > > > > > > TUSCANY-1122 TypeConversionTestCase fails for JDK 1.4.2 > > > TUSCANY-1127 ObtainingDataGraphFromXml, and maybe other samples, > > > incorrectly accessing xsd:any content > > > TUSCANY-1284 Manifest version number in Java SDO Impl and Tools jars > > > TUSCANY-257 recently added file Interface2JavaGenerator.java is not > > > compatible with JDK 1.4 > > > > > > and there are a few others I have my eye on, e.g. 303, if all the above > > > goes well. > > > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12311542&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&fixfor=12312521&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > > > > > [2] > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&fixfor=12312262&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > > > > > > > > On 09/06/07, Steffen Glomb wrote: > > > > > > > > i would like to see support for typesafe collections in the xsd2java > > > > generator. > > > > > > > > regards > > > > Steffen > > > > > > > > On 6/8/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again please. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the fix > > > > > for > > > > > 1223. I have some thoughts that I'm structuring at the moment on > > > > > what's > > > > > important for a next release from my perspective that I'll post > > > > > soon, but > > > > > in general I'm just keen to get the good stuff that we have added > > > > > recently > > > > > out in a release that, as I said before from my perspective, warrants > > > > > the > > > > > title of "1.0". With the Summer holiday season coming up, I'd like > > > > > to do > > > > > this soon so that I can sun myself on a beach without that niggling > > > > > feeling > > > > > of things that ought to have been done ;-) > > > > > > > > > > What say you we put a stake in the ground of aiming for a SDO > > > > > 1.0release to > > > > > be at the IPMC ratification stage by mid-July? > > > > > > > > > > So to that end I ask again, if you have requirements that you feel are > > > > > fundamental to the next release please raise them now; with the > > > > > caveat of > > > > > course that the only way to be sure of getting your requirements into > > > > > the > > > > > release is to step forward and supply the fixes. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > On 23/05/07, David Adcox wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to see the multiple namepace issue resolved in the > > > > > > XSD2JavaGenerator tool. This issue is covered in JIRA 1223. > > > > > > Optionally, making it available to the plugin (JIRA 303) would be > > > > > > nice. JIRA 1143 is something that I need fixed, as well. So any > > > > > > focus that can be given to that prior to this release would be > > > > > > appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the spirit of cooperation, I'll be posting a first pass on 1223 a > > > > > > bit later in the week. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/21/07, kelvin goodson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > With the beta1 release of SDO Java announced, I have begun thinking > > > > > about > > > > > > a > > > > > > next release which I believe can be given the version tag > > > > > 1.0-incubator > > > > > > . We > > > > > > have full coverage of the 2.1 SDO spec in the trunk now, and we > > > > > currently > > > > > > have 33 open JIRAs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=components&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please give feedback on those issues which are important to > > > > > you and, if > > > > > > possible, step up to provide fixes for those issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > If we are to call this the 1.0 release then it ought to provide a > > > > > really > > > > > > good experience for the user. Please share your experiences about > > > > > using > > > > > > the > > > > > > beta1 release and make suggestions or contributions to improve the > > > > > next > > > > > > one. > > > > > > Aside from fixes to the code, key contributions would be to improve > > > > > the > > > > > > instructions, the samples and the documentation (we already have > > > > > > discussions going on about the shape of the release distributions on > > > > > > another > > > > > > thread). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
