Should the scope also be changed ? Now that this is not optional
anymore, it should be on the distribution as well, right ?

On 7/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: kelvingoodson
Date: Thu Jul 12 01:31:01 2007
New Revision: 555532

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=555532
Log:
TUSCANY-1371 - stax is not now optional since the HelperContextImpl carries an 
XMLStreamHelper instance

Modified:
    incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/pom.xml

Modified: incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/pom.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=555532&r1=555531&r2=555532
==============================================================================
--- incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/pom.xml (original)
+++ incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/pom.xml Thu Jul 12 01:31:01 2007
@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@
             <artifactId>stax-api</artifactId>
             <version>1.0.1</version>
             <scope>provided</scope>
-            <optional>true</optional>
         </dependency>

        <!-- dependencies for test cases -->



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to