On 7/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/16/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/16/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 for the release. > > > > I guess that we need to document the issue reported by > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1435 in the release note. > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:06 AM > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating RC3 > > > > > > > Hi again :), > > > > > > Please review and vote on the 0.91 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA > for > > > Java. (RC3). > > > > > > The artifacts are available for review at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscany/0.91-rc3/ > > > > > > This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, > and > > > the > > > Maven staging repository. > > > > > > The SVN tag for the release is: > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/0.91-rc3-incubating/ > > > > > > - Comments on RC2 related to READMEs of samples have been fixed [1]. > > > - License file in binary distribution now includes the missing BSD > > > license reported during IPMC review [2] > > > > > > Othere than these two there are no other changes made to this RC over > > > the previous one. > > > > > > [1] - > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg19690.html > > > [2] - > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14615.html > > > > > > Looks ok to me - so here's my +1. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > +1 for the release. > > Having looked at this now in the cold light of day we still aren't doing a > very good job of tracking fixed JIRA against releases. We've talked about > this before. I'll raise again in a separate thread. Does that mean you're +1/-1 for this RC? ...ant
+1 for the release. Simon
