Sorry, and +1
On 7/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Sounds lot of sense to me. Maybe when commenting out it would be
good to include the number of the JIRA that has been opened for this.
- Venkat
On 7/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I checked the itest/pom.xml and saw quite a few modules are commented
> > out. We removed the failing modules from the build "temporarily" but
> > it ends that they are excluded from the build "permanently". We're
> > cheating ourselves:-(
> >
> > IMHO, we need to handle these situations more carefully moving
> > forward. I suggest that we follow the rules below:
> >
> > 1) Try to fix the failing test case if the break is caused by your
> > changes before the check-in.
> > Otherwise,
> > 2) Open a JIRA to track the issue if you expect other people to fix
> > it. Mark the JIRA as "blocker".
> >
> +1
>
> I'd add:
>
> 3) Mark the JIRA resolved when the problem is fixed :)
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
