I have some questions about the new interface WireableBinding that was
checked in as part of revision r557195.

1. Is it intended that all bindings should (eventually) implement this
   interface, or only some of them?  If only some of them, what's the
   guideline for which bindings should implement it and which should not?

2. For bindings that don't (yet) implement it (i.e., all the current
   extension bindings), what are the limitations on what can be done
   with these bindings?

3. This interface introduces three new getter/setter properties:
     TargetComponent
     TargetComponentService
     TargetBinding
   How are these set/used for reference bindings by the core wiring
   framework?  And how are they set/used for service bindings?

4. The core wiring framework is now calling getURI() as part of its
   determination of whether or not a binding has an endpoint.  Does
   this put new obligations on extension bindings to call their setURI()
   method even if no "uri" attribute was specified in the SCDL?

5. Are there any other changes that extension binding writers need
   to make (or are recommended to make) to fully support the new
   multiple bindings support for references with multiplicity and
   promotion?

  Simon



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to