I guess Venkata is trying to create the deployedArtifact to resolve... >To resolve an artifact, you simple need to create a DeployedArtifact - >see ContributionFactory.createDeployedArtifact() -, set it's URI to the >URI of the artifact inside the SCA contribution, then call >ModelResolver.resolve(theDeployedArtifact).
But I'll wait to see the code. On 7/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > Hi Sebastien / Luciano, > > > > I have this going in my local. But I've had to pass the > > ContributionFactory down to the CompositeProcessor thus adding one > > more argument to the CompositeProcessor contructor. Is there any > > violation of layering in our design with this passing? Just want to > > check this up before I commit the changes. > > > > Thanks > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > I'm not quite sure I understand the relationship between > ContributionFactory and resolution of a file. Could you post the code > somewhere? It'll help me understand. Thanks. > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
