Hi,
Is it different from
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec/1.0/?
If not, we can use the geronimo one and remove our own. Otherwise, renaming
the artifact id to tuscany-commonj-api sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: Group and artifact id for commonj Work and Timer APIs, was:
[Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api
maven artifact
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok the SDO changes for TUSCANY-1468 and TUSCANY-1437 and the associated
SCA
changes are in now. Can anyone confirm things still build ok for them so
I
know I've not left something out?
...ant
Still building :)
in the meantime I have a related comment. I think we need to change the
group id and artifact id for the commonj Work and Timer APIs under
sca/modules/commonj-api as well. Do you want to do it? If you're busy I
can do it as well if it helps.
Build is OK for me, after building SDO and DAS locally (not using the
published snapshots as it looks like others are having problems with
them).
Any comments from anybody on the commonj-api? Any objections against
renaming it to tuscany-commonj-api?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
