A Jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1504) has been raised against the SDO C++ implementation which is saying that for a schema:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:letter="http://letterSchema"; targetNamespace="http://letterSchema";> <xs:element name="letters" type="FormLetter"/> <xs:complexType name="FormLetter"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="date" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="firstName" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="lastName" type="xs:string"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema> the complex type "http://letterSchema#FormLetter"; is not "sequenced" in SDO terms. I believe this is correct as the SDO use of the term "sequenced" is related to the order of the setting of the properties and in the above case maxOccurs=1 on the sequence and each of the contained elements.This means an instance of a FormLetter DataObject returns NULL for getSequence() in our implementation. So... is my interpretation of the spec correct? Cheers, -- Pete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
