sounds sensible to me, +1 to handling this within Axis2. Kelvin.
On 09/08/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thats right, these are the Axis2 tools just with some patches on top to add > support for SDOs and to fix bugs we've come across before we got the bugs > fixed in the Axis2 code. The problem with doing it like this has been we > fall be hind Axis2 and loose track of what we changed and its a headache to > merge things each time there's a new Axis2 release, which is why our > versions have slipped behind like this. I agree we should do just as you say > and work more closely with Axis2, ideally make SDO a first class Axis2 > databinding so we don't even need to modify the Axis2 code. Thats kind of > why I started this thread - to prompt some discussion on what we want this > tooling to be doing. > > ...ant > > On 8/8/07, Brady Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I thought I saw a post recently where someone mentioned that these tools > > were "taken from" axis. If so, are we going to maintain a parallel > > implementation? It might be useful to talk with the axis folks to see if > > these tools can be refactored in such a way as to easily allow the types > > of extensions/additions that Tuscany will be doing, thus avoiding > > duplicate code. > > > > On another note: > > Has anyone ever seen the same tools for C++? If not, maybe we could open > > another thread to discuss implementing them for TuscanySCA Native. > > > > > > -------------------- > > Brady Johnson > > Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA > > Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:47 PM > > To: tuscany-dev > > Subject: Java2WSDL/WSDL2Java tools > > > > Our Java2WSDL and WSDL2Java tools have been a bit neglected and thats > > starting to get a few comments, so what should we do with these? Is the > > intention that these are specifically for SDO or should they be more > > general tools with options to be compatible with all the data binding's > > that Tuscany SCA supports? The ws binding generating wsdl on the fly > > seems related to Java2WSDL, do we expect the wsdl be identical whether > > generated on the fly or from java2wsdl? Should the on the fly generation > > and java2wsdl tool share any common code? There's also the java/xsd > > tools on the SDO project, should any of that code get used by the SCA > > tools when using SDOs? > > > > ...ant > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
