On 8/9/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
- Post 0.95, maybe a couple of weeks after the release, we'd cut > another branch and head with that for 1.0 release. Being a 1.0 > release, we prob. need a branch early as that so that we can whet the > things we are targetting for the release. Thats an interesting proposal :) Its pretty aggressive but actually sounds ok to me, what do others think about a 1.0 in this sort of time frame? It'll make a for a busy next few weeks to make 1.0 good...don't get a 2nd chance for a first impression... If we do go for this then would naming the August release 0.99 instead of 0.95 be more favourable to those who've been preferring the 1.0-beta name over 0.95? ...ant
