On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Laws wrote: > > The binding-ejb one was a mistake > > host-embedded/ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder creates a SCABindingProcessor > > > > I'll go fix the first one and test against the latest code > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Ah OK. If you're talking about this: > > SCABindingProcessor scaBindingProcessor = > new SCABindingProcessor(assemblyFactory, policyFactory, > scaBindingFactory); > StAXArtifactProcessorExtensionPoint processors = > > registry.getExtensionPoint(StAXArtifactProcessorExtensionPoint.class); > processors.addArtifactProcessor(scaBindingProcessor); > > then, as part of factoring the SCA binding out, this initialization > should move the binding-sca module, right? > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Actually Sebastien, you are right (no change there ;-). Now that the binding-sca-xml module is loaded via the services mechanism this manual registration is not required. I'll go remove it.
Thanks for spotting that Smon
