Another great patch! Thanks! Should SDO.h only include headers for the public (i.e. spec) APIs? I think it should so things like DASValue.h should be removed. Anyone who wants to utilize the internal APIs should have to know they are doing it!
What do you think? Cheers, On 10/08/07, Michael Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1375. If it could be reviewed and > applied that would be great. > > Thanks, > > Michael > Rogue Wave Software, Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - > HydraSDO > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:16 PM > To: Michael Yoder > Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1375) C++ SDO spec portability: C++ > type definition API > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1375?page=com.atlassian.ji > ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] > > Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1375: > ----------------------------------- > > Attachment: TUSCANY-1375.txt > > This patch privatizes the internal helper classes used in SDO for > processing XML Schema, and removes their use from SCA. > > > C++ SDO spec portability: C++ type definition API > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: TUSCANY-1375 > > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1375 > > Project: Tuscany > > Issue Type: Bug > > Components: C++ SDO, C++ Specification > > Affects Versions: Cpp-M3 > > Environment: API issue - all platforms > > Reporter: Michael Yoder > > Fix For: Cpp-Next > > > > Attachments: TUSCANY-1375.txt > > > > > > The Tuscany C++ SDO implementation has off-spec type definition > classes which are used by SCA. These should be removed or used only > internally by the implementation until or unless they can be > incorporated into the specification. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Yoder > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:45 PM > > To: 'tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org' > > Subject: C++ SDO spec portability: C++ type definition API Hi, > > C++ Tuscany SDO extends type definition API with the off-spec classes > PropertyDefinition and TypeDefinition, which are used externally by SCA. > > > We also have found the C++ SDO specification type definition API > > lacking, and have added the Impl member function > > DataFactoryImpl::define(DataObjectPtr) > > to parallel the Java type definition API using DataObject's of Types > commonj.sdo#Type and commonj.sdo#Property. > > Should a Jira be raised for these classes to be removed or kept > internal to Tuscany C++ SDO? Is there API here that it would be good to > present to the comittee? > > Thanks, > > Michael Yoder > > Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - > > HydraSDO > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Pete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
