On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Laws wrote: > > On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that > the > >> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or > >> not > >> the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities. > >> > >> Vamsi > >> > >> > >> On 8/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the > >>>>> LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us > >>>>> > >> feedback. > >> > >>>>> Please follow the instructions at > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/README.TXT > >> > >>>>> . > >>>>> The demo scenario is captured at > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/scenario.png > >> > >>>>> . > >>>>> > >>>>> The demo is built on top of the sandbox code in Geronimo [2] which > >>>>> > >> is > >> > >>>>> discussed on [3]. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please note this is just the starting of effort and there are still > >>>>> > >>>> quite > >>>> > >>>>> a > >>>>> lot to do. Please join us on this effort. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the near term, I believe that we need to do the following: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1) Move the code out of sandbox and have them in the build with test > >>>>> cases. > >>>>> 2) The tuscany-geronimo-plugin uses mixed versions of Tuscany Java > >>>>> > >> SCA > >> > >>>>> 0.91-incubating and 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT. Let's try to switch to > >>>>> 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT so that we have consistent modules. > >>>>> > >>>> After switching to 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, I have run into a > >>>> NoClassDefFoundError: > >>>> org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 3) The Geronimo 2.0 RC1 is not being voted on. We should be prepared > >>>> > >> to > >> > >>>> move > >>>> > >>>>> this level. Vamsi, do you have the JIRA GERONIMO-3351 [4] fixed in > >>>>> > >> the > >> > >>>>> RC1? > >>>>> > >>>> GERONIMO-3351 has not been integrated into 2.0 release. Part of the > >>>> problem > >>>> is addressed in branches\2.0 and trunk. It affects only SNAPSHOT > >>>> dependencies and there is some discussion on whether the downloaded > >>>> version > >>>> (if it is different from SNAPSHOT) should be renamed, by the plugin > >>>> installer, to SNAPSHOT or the dependency resolution is Geronimo > should > >>>> handle it in a different way. The problem we have run into is in > >>>> conjunction with another problem that occurs when a trailing "/" is > >>>> > >> not > >> > >>>> present in the maven repo URL. This has been fixed in branches\2.0 > >>>> > >> and > >> > >>>> trunk (not in 2.0 release though) and the work around for this is to > >>>> > >> put > >> > >>>> that trailing "/" in the maven repo URLs in geronimo-plugin.xml > >>>> > >> . These > >> > >>>> two > >>>> fixes will (most likely, but not guaranteed) go into 2.0.1 due to be > >>>> released soon (probably this week). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1] > >>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/ > >> > >>>>> [2] > >>>>> > >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/tuscany-integration/ > >>>> > >>>>> [3] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Geronimo+Integration > >> > >>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Raymond > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory. was taken > out > >>> > >> a > >> > >>> week or so ago when I moved the majority of sca binding into the > >>> binding-sca > >>> module. I'm thinking that I was a little overzealous when I took this > >>> > >> out > >> > >>> and that it probably needs to go back in. In the mean time can you > >>> > >> create > >> > >>> a > >>> > >>> > >>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.impl.SCABindingFactoryImpl > >>> > >>> instead? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> > > You may very well be right. Time to push some new snapshots out! Let me > find > > out how to do that. > > > > Simon > > > > > > Yes I think that new published snapshots will resolve that issue. > > In addition, how about adding the Tuscany/Geronimo integration modules > to our build? This will help us check that we're not breaking them when > we make changes in the rest of the Tuscany code. It will also make it > easier for people to try out the integration from their Tuscany > workspace / development environment. > > The simplest is probably to point to these modules in the Geronimo > sandbox SVN from our java/sca/modules directory using an SVN externals > property... > > Thoughts?
I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put the code in our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessary the Geronimo guys could use SVN externals if they really want it). I'd quite like this code in our svn anyway as some of it could be shared by others who're also integrating Tuscany. ...ant
