Continuum build should be fixed to allocate enough heap space to Maven, 63M is 
not enough
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: TUSCANY-1546
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1546
             Project: Tuscany
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Build System
            Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
            Priority: Critical
             Fix For: Java-SCA-Next


[snip]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Online report : 
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/381/buildId/257310
> Build statistics:
>   State: Failed
>
>   
[snip]

> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] FATAL ERROR
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Java heap space
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Trace
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 29 minutes 48 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Wed Aug 15 02:00:26 PDT 2007
> [INFO] Final Memory: 63M/63M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ****************************************************************************
>   

It looks like our nightly build is breaking with "out of memory" exceptions. 
Most of us are running with more than 63M allocated to Maven and are not 
running into this issue in our local builds.

What needs to happen for the continuum build to allocate more than 63M heap to 
Maven as well?

-- 
Jean-Sebastien



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to