Looking at TUSCANY-313, I was thinking about the use cases and expected behavior.
case 1 - I'm a developer, building an application and I have some broken XSD. I probably just want to get my eclipse project generated so I can continue to work on my application. case 2 - I'm generating my eclipse project, and my application depend on the generated SDO, otherwise I'll get lot's of red x on eclipse and my code won't compile and work. So, in case1, i guess the developer won't really want the broken xsd to be processed, and a quick workaround would be to remove the broken xsd from the list of files to be processed on the project pom, but in case2, I guess the developer would benefit from having the static sdo generated when the eclipse:eclipse phase is processed. Based on this, I was thinking if we really want to change the current behavior. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
