If it comes to (b) then that sounds ok to me, better than not including the ejb binding in the release anyway.
...ant On 8/22/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I looked into this dependency last night as I was hoping the release of > Geronimo 2.0.1 could help us move to a stable level of OPENEJB. Here is > what > I found out: > > a) The Geronimo 2.0.1 release depends on a fixed revision (3.0.0-r562820) > [1] of OPENEJB 3.0.0 stream, but it is not an official release. I'll > investigate more when the G 2.0.1 artifacts show up in the maven repo. > > b) Our dependency on OPENEJB is a "test" dependency. Would it be possible > to > disable the test case so that we release it without SNAPSHOT dependencies? > > Thanks, > Raymond > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.0.1/pom.xml > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "tuscany-dev" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:53 AM > Subject: EJB binding still using OPENEJB snapshot > > > > The ejb binding is still has a dependency on an openejb snapshot jar. I > > can't see a 3.0.0 released version of openejb anywhere, am i looking in > > the > > wrong place? If not what would be the implications of rolling back the > ejb > > binding to not depend on this snapshot? > > > > ...ant > > > >
