Hi, Sebastien.
You're right on what I meant "used to be". IMO, these are in the grey areas
as we're not very sure if we should extend the scoping support for other
component implementation types.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: Difference between o.a.t.sca.scope and o.a.t.sca.core.scope
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
The o.a.t.sca.scope contains the interfaces/classes which used to be SPIs
while the o.a.t.sca.core.scope contains implementation classes.
Thanks,
Raymond
What you said here quickly started a whole new discussion about SPIs :)
but I'd like to make I understand exactly what you meant, since the
packages I'm talking about are not in the list of SPIs in our CHANGES
file...
By "which used to be SPIs", did you mean "which used to be SPIs" before we
modularized the whole kernel 5 months ago, but are not SPIs now I guess,
since they are in the core module and are not listed in the SPI section of
our CHANGES file?
Is that what you meant?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
