Applied now. Another great patch. Thanks! On 22/08/07, Michael Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1371. If someone could review and apply > it that would be great. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:47 PM > To: Michael Yoder > Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1371) C++ SDO spec > compliance/portability: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const > std::string& prop) > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371?page=com.atlassian.ji > ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] > > Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1371: > ----------------------------------- > > Attachment: TUSCANY-1371.txt > > This patch updates the DataObject::getProperty methods to the 2.1 spec > API. > > > C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: > > C++ DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------------------- > > > > Key: TUSCANY-1371 > > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371 > > Project: Tuscany > > Issue Type: Bug > > Components: C++ SDO, C++ Specification > > Affects Versions: Cpp-M3 > > Environment: API issue - all platforms > > Reporter: Michael Yoder > > Fix For: Cpp-Next > > > > Attachments: TUSCANY-1371.txt > > > > > > The Tuscany C++ SDO specification interface introduces off-spec member > function overloads for "getProperty". The SDO 2.1 spec introduces the > member function: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& > prop), whicfh should replace these functions. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Yoder > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 6:35 PM > > To: '[email protected]' > > Subject: C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: > > DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop) Hi, In the > > DataObject interface, these member functions are present which are not > in the C++ 2.1 specification: > > virtual const Property& getProperty(unsigned int index) = 0; > > virtual const Property& getProperty(const char* prop) = 0; > > virtual const Property& getProperty(const SDOString& prop) = 0; > > Since the 2.1 spec now has "getInstanceProperty(const std::string& > prop)", would it be a good idea to file a Jira/patch to replace these > member functions with it in the specification interface? > > Thanks, > > Michael Yoder > > Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - > > HydraSDO > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Pete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
