Hi, I uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1370. If someone could review and apply it that would be great.
Michael Rogue Wave Software, Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - HydraSDO -----Original Message----- From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1370) C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1370?page=com.atlassian.ji ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1370: ----------------------------------- Attachment: TUSCANY-1370.txt This patch removes off-spec member functions from the DataObject interface. > C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: TUSCANY-1370 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1370 > Project: Tuscany > Issue Type: Bug > Components: C++ SDO, C++ Specification > Affects Versions: Cpp-M3 > Environment: API issues -- all platforms > Reporter: Michael Yoder > Fix For: Cpp-Next > > Attachments: TUSCANY-1370.txt > > > The specification interface DataObject.h exposes off-spec member functions, these should be made internal to the implementation. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Yoder > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 6:34 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject Hi, In the > DataObject interface, these member functions are exposed which aren't in the C++ 2.1 spec: > virtual SDO_API bool hasProperty(const char* name) = 0; > virtual SDO_API bool hasProperty(const SDOString& name) = 0; > virtual SDO_API DataFactory* getDataFactory() = 0; > virtual SDO_API void setUserData(const char* path,void* value) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void setUserData(const SDOString& path, void* value) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void setUserData(unsigned int propertyIndex, void* value) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void setUserData(const Property& property, void* value) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void setUserData(void* value) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void* getUserData(const char* path) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void* getUserData(const SDOString& path) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void* getUserData(unsigned int propertyIndex) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void* getUserData(const Property& property) = 0; > virtual SDO_API void* getUserData() = 0; > virtual SDO_SPI const char* objectToXPath() = 0; Would it be > appropriate to file a Jira/patch to have these removed from the spec interface? Or alternatively a Jira to submit them to the spec committee? > Thanks, > Michael Yoder > Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - > HydraSDO -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
