The last time this was discussed, it seemed there was agreement that
it makes sense for the source and binary distros to match (see [1]).
If people want to look at the source to work on unreleased "in progress"
modules, we have a trunk for that :-) Having extra modules in the source
distro and not built isn't a major issue and it won't affect my vote for
releasing 0.99, but it would be good to have matching source and binary
contents for the 1.0 release.
Simon
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200706.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
The source distro seems to have more modules than the binary distro.
1) databinding-saxon & databinding-fastinfoset are packaged in the src
distro
2) a few resource files for binding-osgi slip into the src distro
(such as META-INF/service/org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.ModuleActivator).
The good news is that these modules are NOT listed in the
modules/pom.xml.
Are we OK with this issue?
Thanks,
Raymond
I don't see this as an issue, there's other modules in that case too,
implementation-bpel and implementation-xquery. This in work in progress
not to be included in the build and made available as binaries, but
source distribution users may want to look at the source to start
working on these modules for example.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
