That would be my guess unless there's a newer SDO release by then but i've not seen any mention of that in the SDO emails.
...ant On 8/27/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are you guys thinking about SDO requirements for SCA 1.0 release > ? SDO 1.0-incubating ? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Aug 27, 2007 2:58 AM > Subject: Re: SCA 1.0 release (was Re: Release management for next > release, was: SCA 0.92 release? > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On 8/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/9/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > - Post 0.95, maybe a couple of weeks after the release, we'd cut > > > another branch and head with that for 1.0 release. Being a 1.0 > > > release, we prob. need a branch early as that so that we can whet the > > > things we are targetting for the release. > > > > > > This seems like a really good idea to me. The 0.99 release has again > shown > > that it always takes at least a couple of RCs to discover and resolve > > regressions caused by last minute changes and to polish up the samples, > > and > > for 1.0 we're all likely to be a bit more pedantic about readme and > sample > > problems. How about aiming for a 1.0 branch and RC1 around the 14th of > > September? That gives 3 weeks from now for getting things ready and then > > two > > weeks which should enough for 2 or 3 RCs and voting and still get a 1.0in > > September. > > > > I've created a 1.0 JIRA version and started moving into there JIRAs i'd > > like > > to try to get done for 1.0 : > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312698 > > > > > > One thing that would be good to do now while they're fresh in our minds > is > > for people to commit fixes to trunk for all the sample and readme issues > > they reported in the 0.99 review so they don't get forgotten till > > 1.0review. > > > > ...ant > > > +1 from me. I think we are going to need the extra time to fix the many > small things we found this time round. > > Simon > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
