Cutting the branch around the 14th to give more time to get the
release into shape sounds good.

We always seems to run into lots of minor sample problems when
we produce an RC and I would expect that we would use some of
the time after cutting the branch to fix these up and polish the
samples.  I'm not sure what we would do about "functional" problems
after the branch has been cut.  For the 0.9x releases we have
tended to defer many of these JIRAs to the next release.  For 1.0,
I would expect there to be a greater focus on making sure the
function we deliver in this release is working correctly.  So I
could imagine a 1.0 RC respin to fix a JIRA in the branch for a
functional problem that is serious from a user perspective.

Is this in line with others' expectations?

  Simon

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:

ant elder wrote:

On 8/9/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

<snip>

- Post 0.95, maybe a couple of weeks after the release, we'd cut
another branch and head with that for 1.0 release.   Being a 1.0
release, we prob. need a branch early as that so that we can whet the
things we are targetting for the release.



This seems like a really good idea to me. The 0.99 release has again shown
that it always takes at least a couple of RCs to discover and resolve
regressions caused by last minute changes and to polish up the samples, and for 1.0 we're all likely to be a bit more pedantic about readme and sample
problems. How about aiming for a 1.0 branch and RC1 around the 14th of
September? That gives 3 weeks from now for getting things ready and then two weeks which should enough for 2 or 3 RCs and voting and still get a 1.0 in
September.


+1

I've created a 1.0 JIRA version and started moving into there JIRAs i'd like
to try to get done for 1.0 :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312698


Nice! I think we should all spend a little bit of time now to take look at the JIRAs that we ran into recently. I suggest the following:
- target them for SCA-1.0 if you care about them
- volunteer for them and assign to yourself if you really care about them :)
- target them for SCA-next if you think they can be handled post 1.0


I'll go over the JIRAs I know enough about in the next 2 days.


One thing that would be good to do now while they're fresh in our minds is
for people to commit fixes to trunk for all the sample and readme issues
they reported in the 0.99 review so they don't get forgotten till 1.0review.

   ...ant



+1




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to