Re: Writing Composite and Component Properties

[Raymond Feng]

Hi,

I meant to re-use some of the code in databinding module instead of adding 
it as dependency to assembly-xml. BTW, writing a converter from DOM to 
XMLStreamWriter is probably not too complex.

Thanks,
Raymond

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Writing Composite and Component Properties


Hi Raymond,

Thanks for responding.  As far as I saw the stax-utils have only snapshots
published.  If this is indeed true then it seems like option 1 is better.
But with option 1, is it good to bring in the databinding as a dependency
into assembly-xml.  To me assembly-xml seems to be at must lower layer to
databinding.   Please let me know your opinions about this.

Thanks

- Venkat

On 8/30/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

There are a few ways you can handle this:

1) Use the code in the "databinding" module:

Node2XMLStreamReader and then XMLStreamSerializer

2) Use a BSD-licensed StAXUtils at
https://stax-utils.dev.java.net/nonav/javadoc/utils/index.html.
    // create a DOMSource
    Document doc =
DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance().newDocumentBuilder().parse(...);
    Source domSource = new DOMSource(doc);

    // create a StAXResult
    XMLStreamWriter writer =
XMLOutputFactory.newInstance().createXMLStreamWriter(System.out);
    Result staxResult = new StAXResult(writer);

    // run the transform

TransformerFactory.newInstance().newTransformer().transform(domSource,
staxResult);

Thanks,
Raymond

----- Original Message -----
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 6:28 AM
Subject: Writing Composite and Component Properties


> Hi,
>
> I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1482 and
its
> mostly done -  just the only thing related writing the property values.
> The
> Property class has this value as a xml Document already and it would be
> good
> if we could simply write that out.  Right now I don't see a way to do
this
> from the XMLStreamWriter interface.  I am trying to avoid having to
parse
> this document value which is already an XML doc and then write it again
as
> XML which seems a bit absurd.  Would it be good to directly make use of
> the
> output stream that underlies the XMLStreamWriter ?  If so how would the
> CompositeProcessor's write method avail this ?   Are there other
> alternatives that people can help me with ?
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]