On 9/7/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This has come up several times but I've not seen any conclusion. > > Here are the relevant JIRAs: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-181 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-678 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1389 > > To resolve these JIRAs I think we should include the SCA XSDs [1] in the > Tuscany distribution. > > Is there any issue with the SCA license [2] preventing us to include the > XSDs? > > Is the license going to change now that SCA is being standardized at > OASIS? > > Thoughts? > > [1] http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/ > [2] http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/license.txt > > -- > Jean-Sebastien
I think it should be fine to include them as we already include some other things which also use that OSOA license in previous SCA and SDO releases. It would be interesting to know if the license will be changed to something more standard with the move to OASIS. ...ant
