ant elder wrote:
On 9/13/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See inline.
Simon
Radim Kolarik wrote:
Oh, sorry about the stack trace, it only occurs with older version of
Tuscany when TuscanyServlet is used instead of filters.
I am now using Tuscany snapshot from the Maven repository dated 4th
September, with filters set up in web.xml, but still no luck on
Websphere. There is now no warning or exception in the log, but the
service is not being picked up. It is being picked up in Tomcat.
Do you have any ideas?
Thanks,
Radim
On 9/13/07, Radim Kolarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Yang,
thank you for your suggestions.
I am sure I use the correct root context, because I can access a JSP
within the application successfully. It seems to me that the axis
service is not being recognized at
http://localhost:9201/contextRoot/componentName/serviceName.
I think this might be connected with the port number. If your
.composite file just uses the <binding.ws/> element with dynamic WSDL
generation and no "uri" attribute, then Tuscany will construct a default
URI. There's a hardcoded port number of 8085 in the Axis2ServiceProvider
code, but I think in a webapp environment Tuscany would look for the
webapp server's configured port or fall back to 8080 if it doesn't know
what this is. (I'm not 100% sure of the details of how this works.)
That Axis2ServiceProvider has port 8085 hard coded is a bug.
Axis2ServiceProvider should only be registering the servlet with an explicit
port if <binding.ws> specifies an explicit port. If <binding.ws> doesn't
specify the port then its down to the ServletHost impl to use the default
one, and thats what our WebAppServletHost will do. If we remove the
hardcoded port 8085 in Axis2ServiceProvider this all works fine. The
Tuscany-Geronimo integration also has this problem which is why I was trying
to remove the hard coded port :)
A couple of questions:
1. In a WebSphere environment, can the WebAppServletHost get hold of the
port number configured by WebSphere (9021 in this case)?
2. Do you think at the moment it would try to use port 8085 in this case
even if the WSDL and/or binding URI settings specify 9021? My
experience (though not in a WebSphere environment) is that the WSDL
and/or binding uri setttings override the default of 8085 if they
are specified.
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
