[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529393
 ] 

Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1784:
-------------------------------------

For some reason the web site is not showing the same diagram as is in the page 
in the wiki

How about we  have a digram like you propose that shows what's in a node  + a 
diagram like the one on the (wiki version of the) site that shows how a node 
relates to a domain.  

I don't think the diagram you propose on it's own put across the idea that SCA 
is about more than tightly bound application assembly.



> Picture on SCA Java Web page is confusing
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-1784
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1784
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Website
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Simon Nash
>         Attachments: assembly.jpg
>
>
> The picture on the SCA Java Web page 
> (http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java.html) is technically inaccurate 
> and does not communicate the main value proposition of SCA.  In SCA and 
> Tuscany, each node is in exactly one domain (not shared between domains as 
> shown), and domains communicate with each other using bindings (not through a 
> node as shown).
> This picture could be fixed, but even then it would not be the best showcase 
> for the value proposition of SCA.  Something showing recursive composition 
> and the ability to use multiple bindings would be better.  I'm attaching an 
> example of the kind of thing that I mean.  This would need a bit more 
> tweaking to add the multiple bindings dimension.  I can easily do this if 
> people think it's a good idea. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to