Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/28/07, Dinesh Shahane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw this error when I was trying to build just this module but it went
away when I did a full build.
I do see another error now at runtime (NoClassDefFound) in this module. It
could be due to scope=test
Helloworld-ws-service/pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>apache-activemq</artifactId>
<version>4.1.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
It works fine once I change the scope to runtime.
-----Original Message-----
From: Luciano Resende [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 9:54 AM
To: tuscany-dev
Subject: Strange behavior with helloworld-ws-service and it's ActiveMQ
dependency.
Anyone seeing this :
[INFO] Compilation failure
D:\dev\Opensource\Apache\Tuscany\source\java\sca\samples\helloworld-ws-
service\src\main\java\helloworld\HelloWorldJmsServer.java:[22,34]
package org.apache.activemq.
broker does not exist
D:\dev\Opensource\Apache\Tuscany\source\java\sca\samples\helloworld-ws-
service\src\main\java\helloworld\HelloWorldJmsServer.java:[33,8]
cannot find symbol
symbol : class BrokerService
location: class helloworld.HelloWorldJmsServer
D:\dev\Opensource\Apache\Tuscany\source\java\sca\samples\helloworld-ws-
service\src\main\java\helloworld\HelloWorldJmsServer.java:[33,35]
cannot find symbol
symbol : class BrokerService
location: class helloworld.HelloWorldJmsServer
It's strange, as I do see the ActiveMQ jar and the offending class in
place.
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm seeing this this morning but this is the first time. Been
compiling/running OK over the last few days with these JMS changes. I had to
change the ActiveMQ dependency to a "provided" dependency to get past it.
This seems right as there are compile time dependencies on some ActiveMQ
classes. I don't understand how it was working before though.
Simon
My 2c, if I'm going to use just SOAP/HTTP in an application I probably
won't want to carry a dependency on ActiveMQ, so it would be better to
not have this dependency...
I've not followed this too closely, but didn't we enable support for
SOAP/JMS recently? couldn't that change have triggered this?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
