On 10/1/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 This sounds reasonable, and open.
>
> On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ant elder wrote:
> > > On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > 5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that
> the
> > >
> > >> mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reaches OASIS.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Thats the one i was mainly thinking about.
> > >
> > > "wait until it reaches OASIS" is one option but it doesn't seem ideal
> as it
> > > means it could take quite some time before Tuscany can implement some
> of the
> > > new features.
> > >
> > > The other end of the spectrum is to say we fine with the OSOA way of
> "OSOA
> > > provides means for providing feedback and means for joining as a
> supporter
> > > for access to some non-public materials", that doesn't seem ideal to
> me
> > > either as it doesn't seem right for an Apache project to be
> implementing
> > > something where only a select group have access to the design docs.
> > >
> > > I don't know the answer, I think the main thing is we've shown we
> understand
> > > the issue, have reached some consensus, and are clear about whats
> happening.
> > > I'd be more comfortable with Tuscany only implementing OSOA things
> when
> > > there's a draft published publicly, but even that isn't perfect as it
> takes
> > > sometime for drafts to get published publicly (lets hope there's an
> example
> > > of this imminently).
> > >
> > > What do others think?
> > >
> > >    ...ant
> > >
> > >
> >
> > My 2c:
> >
> > - Work on OSOA public drafts.
> >
> > - Push OSOA to publish drafts quickly when the Tuscany user+developer
> > community is asking for it (a draft of a transaction policy just got
> > published for example [1], I hope we can get implemented in Tuscany soon
> > as several users have been asking for transaction support).
> >
> > - Work on ongoing OASIS work as it's public.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_TransactionPolicy_V051b.pdf
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Sebastien
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> +1 the only option we have is to implement publicly available
specifications.

Simon

Reply via email to