Hi, I have gathered some comments about work going on in JIRA-1816, JIRA-1700 and the draft Tx Policy Spec below. Also tried to list some scenarios.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Transaction+Intents+and+Transaction+Manager+support Please share your comments. Regards, Amita On 9/26/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if we start be defining some scenarios and concrete test cases > before we start making changes on the runtime ? This would probably > make things much easier and would help on the integration with > existing parts of the runtime. Thoughts ? Let me also think little > more overnight and send a more elaborated e-mail tomorrow... > > On 9/25/07, shaoguang geng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, every one, > > > > Suggestion expected. > > I keep processing some try on local transaction support. > > > > I want to find a place to hold a only instance of a TransactionManager > in Tuscany. > > > > Tuscany uses ExtensionPointRegistries to hold those global instances, so > it seems TM instance should be held the same way. > > > > TM is going to be used by JavaImplementationInvoker, but its current > structure has no relation to any EPRs. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > --------------------------------- > > Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web > links. > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
