Hi,

I spent more time reviewing the XQuery implementation type. I think it's a great addition to our XML story. Let me share some of the questions and suggestions I have so far.

1) The <implementation.xquery> model

The current code only supports: <implementation.xquery location="location_of_the_xquery_script"/>. It requires that we locate and load a file which is not very consistent with other extensions (we use QNames to identify artifacts).

I suggest that we use the QName of the XQuery function instead of the location.

For the following XQuery function,

declare namespace quoteJoin="scaservice:java/xquery.quote.QuoteJoin";
declare function quoteJoin:joinPriceAndAvailQuotes($priceQuoteDoc, $availQuoteDoc, $taxRate)

I assume the QName will be: {scaservice:java/xquery.quote.QuoteJoin}joinPriceAndAvailQuotes

<implementation.xquery xmlns:f="<function_ns_uri>" function="f:<function_name>"/>

Do we also want to support the inline XQuery such as <implementation.xquery script="<the_text_of_xquery_script>"?

2) How to map the SCA services/references/properties to XQuery?

We currently use the namespace in XQuery to define SCA services/references/properties as follows:

declare namespace quoteJoin="scaservice:java/xquery.quote.PropertiesQuoteJoin"; declare namespace quoteCalculator="scareference:java/xquery.quote.QuoteCalculator"; declare namespace priceQuoteDoc="scaproperty:xml/http://www.example.org/price:priceQuote";;
declare namespace taxRate="scaproperty:java/java.lang.Float";

declare variable $quoteCalculator external;
declare variable $priceQuoteDoc external;
declare variable $availQuoteDoc external;
declare variable $taxRate external;

I suggest that we refine the naming convention of the namespaces.

The e-mail is getting lengthy. I'll post more questions/suggestions as we go.

Thanks,
Raymond


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to