Hi, Yes this is something that I want to resolve along with what I am facing with policies for implementation elements. I suppose the problem is just about similar.
Thanks. - Venkat On 10/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've been trying to figure out if there is a common pattern in how > >> implementations and bindings could be interpretting and applying > >> policies so > >> that we could include this in the SPI. But haven't been successful > with > >> this. Maybe with getting policies to work with a few implementation > >> types > >> will give a better idea. > >> > Looking at this I noticed that Policy.getOperations() is still commented > out. Are you going to put the operation support back? > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
